Talk:Spiderqueen Nerscylla/@comment-26532315-20160125170832/@comment-4212769-20160127144314

@Ratalosaurus rioreurensis: It is not the "direct ancestor" of Uragaan but a relative because equally how alike it looks to this ancestor it had about the same generations as Uragaan had and so is another, more "primitive", relative (sub)species to Uragaan. You can't call the coelacanth of today the ancestor of land vertebrates as they had also many generations and changed as well but just not as much visible. What lives today can only be the ancestor of tomorrow's animals. .